Tuesday, January 22, 2008

COLUMBUS SYMPHONY

For people interested in learning more about the current situation with the Columbus symphony, I urge you to visit their website and download the document
The Path to Financial and Future Growth.

Go to www.columbussymphony.com.

You should also check out a new blog/website begin by a young musician at Ohio State, Mathew Brahm.

www.proudsupporterofthecolumbussymphony.blogspot.com

Mr. Brahms is putting a lot of effort into his-go look.
One thing that really saddened me was a comment by a CSO member, a fantastic musician, who said he feared repercussions if he commented on his own blog.
Ridiculous. This is a prime stakeholder and his opinions are important.
I hope this unhappy situation can at least be discussed constructively by both "sides" and their friends, all of whom have the same goal: supporting a world class orchestra in Columbus.

For myself, I don't envy artists or management. Good guys all. Lousy situation.
It was great being in the Ohio Theater Saturday night to hear the CSO w. Hirokami blow the roof off the place with Beethoven's 7th, the Vaughan Williams Fantasia and Wetherbee's elegant reading of the Korngold violin concerto.
This was first class music making. The program was held almost 20 minutes to accommodate a crowded box office with walk in business.
It was a great night. They can all be great nights! The talent is not in question, nor the willingness of a large public to turn out and applaud, and applaud, and applaud.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Why do you and Barbara Zuck call performances "readings" as you do in this blog? Mr. Wetherbee was performing from memory so in no sense was it a reading. A reading is what you would call the first time through a piece at rehearsal. Calling a rehearsed performance a "reading" is a strange use of the word.